Episode 180: Help Me C4K! My Kids Need to Learn about Circumcision!

Or maybe you think they don’t need to learn about Circumcision. Fair enough, but I can’t teach them anything about Genesis 17 and the foundation of the Land Grant Covenant without dealing with it. Neither of us can teach them about the important Scriptural meta-narrative of the circumcision of the heart that they will need to understand in order to live as disciples in the New Creation life we want for them. I will also be talking frankly about the importance of being open and honest with our kids about body parts and sex because if we can’t do that, then they won’t have adequate guides in us for learning the Bible. And when they do have questions, they will find someone else. In addition, I also talk about the importance of calling things what they are, without shame, and how it prevents sexual abuse.

(My affiliate links for Amazon products are included in the post. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.)

If you can’t see the podcast player, click here. If you are interested in the longer YouTube version, click here.

 

Hey there, and now for something completely different. When I began teaching the kids Genesis in October 2020, I knew the day would come when I would have to decide how to handle some truly risqué and even horrifying sexual material with the kids. Since I don’t really look good in an ankle bracelet, my solution is to teach parents the background material, which will allow me to be deliberate and cautious with how I handle the material for kids–skipping over what I need to skip over. I wrote a book called Context for Adults: Sexuality, Social Identity and Kinship Relations in the Bible (affiliate link) where I covered some of this sort of material for the sake of parents hopefully being able to answer the hard questions as they came up. But something I didn’t talk about, because there is nothing horrible about it, is the circumcision commandment that I can’t teach Genesis 17 without talking about. If you are anything like me, then this isn’t a big deal and you don’t mind talking about it (I suppose it’s the scientist in me) but I know that a lot of you parents were raised not only to be very ashamed of your sexuality (I think that’s just my generation in general had that problem) but to not call things by their names, which can be very damaging to a person’s ability to communicate sexual assault and even just normal medical problems—no matter what age they are. Folks, they are just body parts like anything else and talking about them like they are normal helps, and doesn’t hinder, us in keeping our kids safe from harm and discouraging premarital relations. Euphemisms can be very dangerous and destructive in our modern society and we need to get it through our skulls that Bible kids weren’t sheltered.

Now, my kids were taught the unfiltered Torah portions once they hit the age of eleven—and I would have done it earlier if I had been teaching it to them earlier than that. It isn’t like they are editing them in the Synagogue. The Bible is an insanely violent and sexual book—in all the wrong ways—and believe me, you want your kids exploring this material with someone they can trust and not opening up the Bible in private one day and coming across this stuff without a lot of hand holding and guidance. Last time I taught one of these was after Utah schools decided to ban a ton of books under the banner of protecting kids from inappropriate knowledge of sex. Well, the day it happened, I was like, “Oh man, what are the Christians and Mormons going to say when the first book to go is the Bible because I know that wasn’t their intent!” And wouldn’t you know it, BAM, that’s exactly what happened and how can anyone even defend having material like that in the School library when stuff that is so much milder has been tossed out? The Bible talks about whacked stuff when it comes to sex, no matter how hard we might try to hide it.

So anyway, being able to talk to our kids about the embarrassing stuff we wish wasn’t even in the Bible is a whole lot easier when we can talk about the stuff that was never supposed to be embarrassing—like the topic of Genesis 17, the circumcision aspect of Abram’s Covenant. Something so important and central to the identity of Israel’s men that Abram’s name is formally changed to Abraham right before the commandment is given. Talking about this isn’t optional and as long as we are able to talk to our kids in healthy ways about all of our body parts, male and female, this really isn’t going to be a problem for them or for us. Let me give you an example from my own life.

When my twins were five, they came to me—super serious—and asked me how babies get inside the mommies. In my family, this was a genuine mystery because they had zero experience with pregnancy and babies being born as I was always capable of getting pregnant but never making it past the first few months of pregnancy. Of course, when they went to friends’ houses, it was an entirely different situation and now they were very curious. So, they asked me; I answered in the most age-appropriate way I could think of, “Well, the daddies put them in there, of course.” They looked at each other and were satisfied with my answer. For three whole years. At the age of eight, they still vividly remembered the conversation as though it had happened the day before and they came to me and asked—super serious— “How do the daddies put the babies in the mommies.” To tell you the truth, I was quite impressed that the conversation was so vivid in their memories and that they were coming to me (hopefully) first. Parents, you need to know that when your kids can ask the question, if you don’t tell them the truth then someone else will. Someone you can’t control. I asked them—super serious— “Once you know you can never ‘not know’ again—are you sure you want to know?” They assured me that they were and so I told them, using all the names of all the body parts. When I was done, they walked away, huddling together and whispering as twins are wont to do. Three weeks later, they returned and asked a very unexpected question, “We’re adopted, right?”

Well, I was floored. “Of course, you are adopted, you guys have known Mamma Stephanie and the whole story since you were babies.” I couldn’t have been more confused about where things were going with this, lemme tell ya. But the look on their faces was one of pure relief. “We just knew you would never do something like that with Dad…” and they walked away happily until they turned eleven and somehow it dawned on them that I wasn’t actually a virgin. And I can tell you that my sons, twenty-two years old, still come to me with the tough and embarrassing questions—a fact for which I am grateful. I still talk to them about sex, and they are willing to have those conversations as I teach them how to be good husbands to happy wives instead of selfish idiots. And moms, their dads aren’t the ones who can tell them what it is like to be a woman and how to care for us and about us in ways that are meaningful inside and outside the bedroom—that’s all on us. Too many marriage books have been written from the very narrow perspective of what a man wants and expects from a woman. If we want blessed daughters-in-law and the best possible chance at happy marriages for our sons and intact homes for our grandbabies, we have to be there to speak for them. It’s never too late to have a healthy relationship with our kids where they know they can trust us with whatever is going on in their lives. No, they will never tell us everything but it is important for them to know that they can. The more embarrassed we are, the more curious they will be. But boys who know about the struggles their wives might have before they are married aren’t going to act like spoiled, selfish brats on their wedding night if their wives are too exhausted, scared, or intimidated to have sex. Or if they have a medical condition that makes sex impossible without medical intervention. Do not allow their only information about sex to come from other men—not even their dads.

Anyway, so Genesis 17 is founded upon the bedrock of the ritual of circumcision that was introduced to Abram when he was eighty-nine years old and Ishmael was thirteen. But Abram wasn’t ignorant of it, it was not an unknown practice in the ancient world and especially among the priesthood of the nations of the ancient Near East. In fact, we have knowledge of circumcision among the priests in Egypt and I have to imagine that when Joseph successfully interpreted Pharaoh’s dream, one of the reasons he was immediately trusted to undertake the grain storage project and given the daughter of a priest in marriage is because when they were bathing and shaving him from head to toe, they discovered he was circumcised. In their eyes, he came to them as a priest of the Most High—one of the many gods in their shared world that they might have knowledge of. I once had a preacher claim that Joseph could prove his identity to his brothers by showing them his circumcision but there would have been nothing strange about that as he was a priest in Egypt himself, one who hears and speaks for the gods. If he had whipped out his penis to show them his circumcision, they would have been likely alarmed that he was about to sexually assault them (to shame them) as in the tale of Seth and Horus, not that he was proving his identity. People come up with some truly oddball ideas when they don’t know the context of the ancient world.

And if you are disturbed by the word penis, I want to ask why? The Bible certainly doesn’t shy away from the word or the concept. Foreskin is used five times in this chapter and if your kids can’t understand the idea of circumcision, which is mentioned ten times in this chapter, then there is no way for them to relate to the utterly foundational concept of the circumcision of the heart to the metanarrative of the Bible. And that knowledge cannot be skipped over. In fact, circumcision gets mentioned more in the New Testament than in the old. Hamstringing our kids by not teaching them about a surgical procedure because we don’t like to mention the body part involved is ludicrous—and all of y’all who have kids know what a penis is and what it is used for, okay? If you can make use of it, or even wipe it clean or have one go off in your face while changing a diaper, then saying it should be a piece of cake. It’s a body part and nothing to be ashamed of. I tell you one thing for sure, little boys don’t start out being bashful about it. I resorted to telling my kids that mine froze and snapped off when I was little to get them to stop trying to escape out the door when it was snowing. Okay, I didn’t have to but it was funny. We all laugh about it now. Normalize the sacredness and lack of shame about body parts. As a matter of fact, a female relative of mine—when she was growing up, her family was so nonchalant about the whole thing that when she married, she was not only a virgin but today enjoys an incredible sex life because she wasn’t saddled with shame or fear over it. But, back to talking about circumcision.

So, Abram would have known about the circumcision of priests—you know, I imagine men are always going to talk about something like that and glad it isn’t them—but the circumcision of all the regular, everyday males of a household was just unprecedented. I mean, slaves as well. What the heck? Yahweh was setting apart everyone associated with Abram. Yahweh was beginning the process of making the camp holy, or kadosh. This meant that Abram’s camp would begin to be different from the rest of the ancient Near Eastern world. One thing we do know specifically about the Canaanites, Abram’s nearest neighbors, is that they didn’t practice either child or adult circumcision—in fact, they are routinely referred to as “uncircumcised” throughout the Torah and there has been nothing unearthed through archaeology making any references to the followers of El or Ba’al being circumcised even as priests. The Egyptians, however, even show the circumcision process of adult males in their artwork. The tomb of Ankhmahor is called the “doctor’s tomb” because the walls are carved with sometimes graphic depictions of medical procedures. The most famous of these is of a circumcision, about five hundred years before the life of Abraham. I am including the link to a video of the relief in the transcript. It’s super cool.

Circumcision in the household of Abram was a sign and symbol of the Covenant to give Abram and his descendants the Land—hence the reason why Abram was renamed Abraham right before the commandment to circumcise was given. Abraham was given a new identity, and the command to circumcise everyone bound to his household, in preparation for his offspring becoming a nation of priests. The command to circumcise was even for Ishmael, despite God not finding him an acceptable heir. Likely this had nothing to do with Ishmael but with the circumstances of his existing at all, which we talked about in our last special episode. Yahweh would be honoring both Hagar and her son Ishmael, and they would be the source of many great nations and kings after Hagar acquired an Egyptian wife for him.

Circumcision was one of the nine covenant signs between Yahweh and His people: (1) the rainbow (Gen 9), (2) circumcision (Gen 17), (3) removal of the leaven for the Passover and the week of Unleavened Bread (Ex 13:3-10), (4) the dedication of the firstborn—people and animals (Ex 13:15-17), (5) the Sabbath (Ex 31:13-17), (6) the destruction of the bronze censors at the Tabernacle after the revolt against Aaron by Korah and his buddies (Num 16), (7) Aaron’s rod sprouting in the wilderness after the challenge by the heads of the other tribes of Israel (Num 17), (8) the memorial stones that Joshua set up in the Land of Israel (Joshua 8), and (9) the commandments as a sign on the back of the hand and on the forehead (Deut 6:8). These specific signs were given as proof of God’s choices. God chose to save humanity instead of destroying it, witnessed by the rainbow. Abraham’s offspring were chosen to be a special nation, but only through Isaac and Jacob (even though all his descendants were circumcised). The children of Jacob were chosen to be freed from bondage in Egypt in such a way that they left without time for their dough to rise. They and those who joined them at Sinai were chosen and given the covenant and the Sabbath, the dedication of their firstborn, and the commandments to make them wise. Aaron and his descendants were chosen for the priesthood and given the sole responsibility of the service of the Tabernacle and the tithes. The children of Israel were given the Land of Canaan. Each one of these choices was backed up by signs—and especially when we see how Yahweh defended His choice of Aaron as High Priest.

But the first major sign of God doing a new thing in the earth to bring forth the Messiah was the circumcision not just of the children, but of the people of Abraham. Abraham would have understood that he was being made into a nation of priests through the miracle of a child born to Sarah, his wife. What we do not know for sure is why people started doing this in the first place, long before Abraham was born. Was it about purity or just plain old status? We don’t know and can only guess. But it really doesn’t matter because by the time God gave it as a special sign to His people, it meant something very concrete, very holy. It meant that a man was set apart as a priest. It did not mean that every man of Israel was an actual functioning priest, but it was symbolic of the fact that every man and every woman descended from Abraham was of priestly lineage and therefore their prayers could be heard without mediation from the time they were children. If you listened to the Yom Kippur prayers this week along with me, you likely heard this very thing stated. It gave them a status in life higher than all the nations around them—much like the wearing of tassels which were a symbol of wealth and status among the other nations. I was thrilled to death when I went to the St Louis Museum of Art, and I saw a relief from the Palace of Assurbanipal II with a winged divine figure wearing tassels that went down almost to the danged floor. I about wept. So cool. Yahweh did everything He could to extend dignity to His people and the whole “be holy because I am holy” was a message to the nation that He gave them dignity because without it they couldn’t be His representatives in the world. They weren’t all that and a bag of chips, they were chosen to represent all that and a bag of chips. Same goes for us, folks.

All this goes to say is that the Bible isn’t the least bit shy about our bodies or about reproduction and dang some of the rhetoric in the prophets is profoundly disturbing (I’m talking to you, Ezekiel, with your X-rated chapter 23!). The Bible presupposes that the people reading it and hearing about it are acutely aware of sex and how and why it happens. Not only were they an agricultural society, but there is no real privacy for a married couple from the kids in tents or houses that small, okay? The neighbors knew everyone’s business. Really, this bashfulness is very much a modern European phenomenon (but most certainly not from the French) and it has never truly served us well but has perpetuated inappropriate shame, mystery, and confusion. How can we say that something is both sacred and shameful? This shame hampers our Bible studies and prevents us from raising children who can talk about their bodies and not be inappropriately ashamed if someone violates them. Let’s make sure we aren’t protecting kids from concepts that were actually given to protect them when we are as open about it as the Bible is. Call things what they are and then you won’t have to edit out things like circumcision, a basic medical procedure that shouldn’t be embarrassing to anyone. Kids who have someone in the immediate family they can talk to about anything are safer than those who only have non-family members who they talk to about anything. You will not hear about sexual abuse from a child whom you have instructed, through shame, to be so humiliated to talk about their bodies that they can’t work through the confusion of molestation feeling bad and being psychologically damaging but also sometimes feeling pleasurable. They need to know what is natural, feeling pleasure, versus what is unnatural, being used by an adult or another child. This knowledge isn’t giving them over to the ‘liberal establishment” but it will protect them from abuse.

As parents and grandparents and aunts and uncles and human beings, we have a sacred obligation to protect children but only parents can give them the knowledge they need to be empowered against abuse and realize that they haven’t done anything wrong when faced with a situation where they are going to lack the wisdom and physical ability to say no. We rightly call this rape, when there is a power differential between two people that is being abused. Think of David using his guards to haul Bathsheba from her required mikvah into his palace while having no male protection at home. Think of Amnon along with his young teenage sister Tamar (hopefully she was a teenager but she might have been younger). Think of what the men of Sodom were doing in overwhelming and overpowering foreign visitors. Think of what the Benjamites were doing to their fellow Israelites by using the same tactics. If we see it as rape today because there was no ability to consent because there was no ability to say no, then it was rape then as well.

Anyway, if this is something you need help teaching your kids about, check out my teaching on holiness, circumcision, and signs in the Bible over on my Context for Kids channel this week.




“This is the beginning of months for you:” Egyptian Calendars, the birthdays of the gods, and why Goshen was the “best of the Land.”

sphinxEx 12:2 This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: it shall be the first month of the year to you.

Slaves don’t live by their own timetable, and after over eighty years in slavery (we know they were enslaved during the reigns of two Pharaohs but we are not told when the actual slavery started), they once again had to be set straight – this article will show you the reason for the confusion. 

In preparation for teaching Exodus, I reviewed all my Egyptian books because it was very much Egyptian religion (the first mention in scripture of anything is important and Egypt is where we have the first mention of heathen priests, magicians and our first real exposure to false religion) that infected Israel during their sojourning. Like I always say, “Aaron didn’t figure out how to make a golden calf out of his own imagination, that took a specific skillset.” He had seen something that was generally only seen within the confines of a Temple or in a public processional and on top of that, he actually made one – but we’ll talk about that in a few weeks.

Egyptian literature is full of interesting and funny stories like this one about the birth of the “big five” gods and goddesses that also gives us an insight into the Ancient Near Eastern mindset of what gods (unlike YHVH) were like and this one provides a window for the ancient calendar system as well. I enjoy studying this because we see in these stories, oftentimes, the reasons for the plagues on Egypt.

Osiris, Horus, Seth, Isis and Nephthys were born during the last five days of the Egyptian year (called epagomenals) but their year is unlike the Hebrew year which starts in the Spring, or the late era Roman year which started in January (beginning in about 45/46 BCE). Egyptian years are tied into the inundation (flooding) of the Nile, which begins in late June – and is today celebrated in August at the culmination. You know, in the ancient world you really don’t find the birthdays of any gods pointed out, Egypt seems to be rather unique and only seems to be mentioned as a way of “correcting” the calendar by acknowledging that 360 days was’t truly a solar year. In fact, I have found birthdays of gods to be singularly unimportant (and unmentioned) until we get to Imperial Cult, when the deified Emperor’s birthday became a holiday. Up until then, the focus was on their lives and their birth would only be mentioned in relationship to the circumstances around it, not related to the dates which were hard to pin down with any accuracy. It was the legend around the birth, and not the date, that was mentionable because calendars worldwide were a total mess until 45 BCE (before then, Roman months alternated between having either 29 or 31 days, ugh) and we cannot accurately tie ancient events to a Roman calendar system that wasn’t even set in stone until then. In fact, the Roman year for a long time only had ten months with the entire winter kinda left out in the cold, so to speak. Hence in Egypt we have rare birthdays of gods pinpointed to the last five days of the Egyptian year. That’s why we see ancient events narrowed down to a year and a season within that year, as best as possible, but even that can sometimes be debatable. The Bible, of course, will sometimes name a date on the Hebrew calendar which then still cannot be absolutely lined up with a Roman calendar date that was not yet in existence.

The Egyptian calendar was 360 days long, with three ten day weeks in a month, and only three seasons, beginning with the inundation (flooding) of the Nile – the time when all the silt was washed down from Upper (southern) Egypt into Lower (northern) Egypt and most significantly, into the Land of Goshen – making it the fertile “best of the Land” – the ideal place for YHVH to place the Israelites. Remember that everyone had to sell their land to Pharaoh in order to pay for food during the last years of the famine but that would not have extended to Joseph’s family because they received their provisions for free. Can you imagine the animosity towards his family once a Pharaoh came to power who did not know Joseph and all these foreigners were landowners and the native-born Egyptians were tenant farmers??

Anyway, I digress, again. So the Egyptians had a dilemma – they had a 12 month calendar with 30 days each month but that left them with a problem at the end of their calendar year at the arrival of the inundation – the beginning of new life in Egypt. So they developed a mythology about the goddess Nut who was cursed with the inability to give birth during all 360 days of the year by her grandfather Re (after having given birth already to the sun, stars and planets). After playing dice with Thoth, she won five more days and was able to bear children during those days, evading her grandfather’s curse – as they were not considered actual days of the year. Egyptian legalism! During this time she gave birth to Osiris, Horus, Seth, Isis and Nephthys – the “big five” in Egypt.

(Note: Horus started out as the brother of Osiris and Isis and in later years became identified as their son – in this type of early period mythology he is called Horus the Elder)

People often ask me about my source material for Egyptology, so I am going to try and list all the useful books I have on it. Egypt, as I was explaining in yesterday’s Context for Kids video, is where Israel was born – during the hundreds of years they spent there, Egypt became their cultural context and it caused a lot of problems in the wilderness. They had to relearn everything and become an entirely new people – and one of their chief problems was a continual turning back to Egypt. For my Context for Kids parents who are reading this – exercise great caution in simply handing over any Egyptian book to your kids. Egyptian mythology is filled with the abominations spoken of in Leviticus 18 – pretty much all of them.

This specific myth, I took out of Barbara Watterson’s The Gods of Ancient Egypt but you can find it in practically any Egyptian book. I like to recommend this book to people because it is a very easy read – and considering it was written by a PhD Egyptologist that is rare. PhDs generally don’t write the language I call “normal people” but instead write to impress other scholars.

Information on the actual epagomenal days – Anthony Spalinger, Some Remarks on the Epagomenal Days in Ancient Egypt, Journal of Near Eastern Studies Vol. 54, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 33-47

Donald B Redford, The Ancient Gods Speak is what I have been reading lately. The information I have been teaching lately about the Egyptian priestly/magician class, the mummification of Jacob and Joseph, and such have been coming from this book. He compiled articles from the best of the best of Egyptian experts from all over the world, in their respective specialties – which is always helpful because no one knows everything and it is nice to hear from the people who really know their stuff in the one area. 

John D Currid, Ancient Egypt and the Old Testament. Dr Currid has been the Project Director for Bethsaida Excavations Project in Israel for almost 20 years.

Anthony S Mercatante, Who’s Who in Egyptian Mythology – this was my first Egypt book, very readable but not very detailed

Sir Wallis Budge, Egyptian Religion – One of the first books on Egyptology and okay but we have learned a lot since 1899. Never use him as your sole source of information, make sure that modern research backs him up because there were many misconceptions in his time.

Richard H Wilkinson, Reading Egyptian Art – this has been more useful than I first imagined. I originally bought this book because Rico Cortes recommended it for it’s description of the Djed column, the backbone of Osiris that I believe was the Column of Fire that terrified the Egyptians in the wilderness because it would have been seen as a harbinger of death for Pharaoh. But I found better information on this in Redford.

Also, Wilkinson’s The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt.

Ogden Goelet, The Egyptian Book of the Dead – huge and gorgeous book about Egyptian afterlife beliefs, which are vital to understanding the mindset of the Egyptians and especially the Pharaohs.

The Anchor Bible Dictionary

Karel Van der Toorn, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible – can’t even begin to tell you how much I respect this author, one of the best minds on the subject of ANE religion as it pertains to the Bible. His Nimrod research is amazing, well documented, and does not at all line up with what is being taught in the online urban legends of religious evolution.

Sir J Gardiner Wilkinson Manners and Customs of the Egyptians Vol 1, 2 and 3 (it’s an older book – available for online download at archive.org) – originally printed in 1836 and is probably most well known as having been misrepresented by another author in an age where checking references was a lot harder than it is now.

Douglas J Brewer and Emily Teeter, Egypt and the Egyptians – Brewer spent 18 years in the field in Egypt and is a professor of anthropology, Teeter is research associate and curator of ancient Egyptian and Nubian antiquities at the Oriental Institute Museum, University of Chicago.

I have some other books, and I hope I haven’t forgotten any good ones as my book shelf is in disarray at the moment, but mostly I wouldn’t want you to waste your time or money on a lot of them.




Pharaoh and the Crafty Midwives

So, after putting out Context for Kids episode #13 where I talked about the Ordeal by Water attested to in several Assyrian and Babylonian law codes, one of my parents asked me about the midwives and Pharaoh’s first attempt to kill the Hebrew males through them–well, the midwives’ trickery is an amusing tale once you know exactly what Pharaoh believed and how the midwives used it against him. People ask me why I study ancient Egypt and this is an example of why. I have never seen it taught before but to me it just makes perfect sense based on their religious beliefs.

Whereas the goddess Hathor was believed to be responsible for the conception of children, it was two lesser known deities who were responsible for protecting both woman and baby in childbirth–Ta-weret and Bes. I call them the midwife’s best friends.

Tawaret_figurine_(Boston_MFA)

Ta-weret (image credit), depicted as a hippopotamus with a crocodile’s tail, was the embodiment of the two great dangers of the Nile and as the consort of Bes, was responsible for helping women in labor. She was known as the protector of the child Horus (this will be important later). (click on the link above if you want to see a very cool article on the finding of a Bes vessel in an archaeological dig of Persian-era Israel. They were like gargoyles)

Egypte_louvre_012

 

Bes (image credit), her consort, was depicted as a dwarf or pygmy and was purposefully made hideous with an amalgam of silly features for the purpose of scaring away demons, snakes, or anyone else that would harm a baby – and later served as the child’s friend. He was considered a comforting presence. I chose this particular image because you can see him resting on the “s-z” symbol, which represents protection. Bes is also associated with protecting the child Horus.

So these two, in the eyes of Pharaoh, were the deities responsible for the protection of mother and child and the blessing of the birthing process. The Pharaoh who “did not know Joseph” gave the Hebrew midwives an ultimatum.

Ex 1:16 And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.

What an unthinkable situation to be in! Yet the brave midwives refused to obey Pharaoh and when he figured it out, he calls them back in. What is their response and why does it work?

Ex 1:19 And the midwives said unto Pharaoh, Because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian women; for they are lively, and are delivered ere the midwives come in unto them.

In the eyes of Pharaoh, this casts reasonable doubt on the justice of what he is doing; he is faced with the possibility that the gods might not be on his side. Ta-weret and Bes were quite possibly assisting the women in laboring too quickly for the midwives to show up and kill the male babies.

His solution to the problem is to resort to another test–the ancient River Ordeal spoken of in the codes of Hammurabi (1750 BCE #2 and 132), Ur-Nammu (2100 BCE #13 and 14), and in Middle Assyrian Law tablet A (1076 BCE #17, 22, 24 and 25).

The River Ordeal, or Trial by Cold Water, reflected the concept that if you throw someone into deep water and they survive, then the gods saved them, but if they drowned it was because the gods killed them. Don’t laugh, they would think you were ridiculous too if you told them that the sun is really a self-contained nuclear reaction instead of Amun-Re rowing his solar boat across the sky. It’s all a matter of what is normally accepted as fact and we aren’t any quicker to give up the ridiculous stuff we want to believe either. (I mean, if, for every time I passed a magazine that said Jennifer Aniston was having a baby, she actually had a baby–she would have her own country right now and yet people swear by those magazines. Whenever they are wrong they just move on to the next fabrication in order to keep selling more magazines “1984” style lol)

So, let’s just say that Pharaoh, who absolutely believed in the authority of his gods, got a second opinion. If Bes and Ta-weret were helping the Hebrew women, the river would not take the babies. After all, Ta-weret represented the two most fearsome threats of the Nile – the Hippopotamus and the Crocodile. She saved baby Horus from Set, so if she was responsible then he would find out.

Although the midwives’ trickery was an amusing success in pulling the wool over Pharaoh’s eyes (it would definitely have been in the eyes of Moses’s audience), the exposed babies did not survive the River Ordeal–save one. Moses survived. When Pharaoh’s daughter pulled him out of the river, she would have likened it to the story of Horus being saved by Ta-weret from Seth. She, and later Pharaoh, would have seen this child as having been judged innocent by the gods and under the specific protection of Ta-weret and Bes.

Spanish Version here

Image Credits:

“Tawaret figurine (Boston MFA)” by Madman2001 – Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons – https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tawaret_figurine_(Boston_MFA).jpg#/media/File:Tawaret_figurine_(Boston_MFA).jpg

“Egypte louvre 012”. Licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0 via Commons – https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Egypte_louvre_012.jpg#/media/File:Egypte_louvre_012.jpg

References:

Martha T Roth, Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor

Richard H Wilkinson, The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt

Barbara Watterson, The Gods of Ancient Egypt

Donald B Redford, The Ancient Gods Speak: A Guide to Egyptian Religion




Confronting Pseudo-Archaeological Memes Pt 6: Is saying “Amen” Pagan?

rosettaIf you know me, then you know I do not tread lightly in the area of linguistics. My reason is simple – I am not fluent in any language except English and serious linguistic studies require more than a basic knowledge of a language. I like to joke that I can read Hebrew – but I usually have no idea what I am reading. What I can do is sound out words, and recognize a growing number of them, which does not make me even a novice much less an expert. When I do need to cover this area, I have experts whom I consult – people who can speak the language and who are also knowledgeable about the “rules” and intricacies of the language historically. I refuse to armchair quarterback such an important area of study or to parade my ignorance before you. Beyond my growing ability to use Logos, which does not make me a language scholar, I readily admit that this is most certainly not my area of expertise. Frankly, I just can’t know everything.

Fortunately, answering this question doesn’t require any knowledge whatsoever of ancient Egyptian which is a good thing because no one, and I mean no one who is actually still alive, knows what the language sounded like. Most of the names of Egyptian gods and goddesses in our repertoire are actually Greek. That’s right, the Greeks gave many Egyptian gods and goddesses Greek names–and those are the names, like Osiris, that we are often most familiar with–and they did this long after the Hebrew Scriptures were written with all its “Amens” and “Yahs”. At the time that the Greeks were writing the stories of the ancient Egyptian mythologies (enter Herodotus, who was too quick to tell us what monuments said when almost no one in the world could still read hieroglyphics and has now been proven wrong), they also loved to put their own spin on everything – thus the Grecian naming of deities and cities (in fact we still largely use Greek city names in Egypt to this day). Words that we have popularly believed to be Egyptian are actually Grecian in origin. Pharaoh Thutmose’s real name was actually dhwty-nht – say that three times fast! Oh wait, no vowels, we can’t even say it once!

When Egyptologists unlocked hieroglyphics they found that, like Hebrew and all other languages of the day, there were no vowels. Ancient Egyptian evolved into Demotic (a Greek-influenced form of Egyptian) around 600 BC (only priests in Herodotus’ day could read hieroglyphics) and into Coptic around 200 AD. By the seventeenth century, even Coptic was a dead language – being the African equivalent of Latin and only used for liturgies. Coptic was not the third phase of the language, however, but the sixth. During the times of the Kings of Israel, Egypt had entered into the fourth evolution of its language. Nowadays, Egyptians speak a form of Arabic, as they have for centuries.

Here’s the deal – no vowels – every linguist on the planet and every Egyptologist will tell you that the reconstruction of ancient Egyptian is based on knowledge of consonants only and the vowels are pure guesses. They made certain “executive decisions” about what vowels would go where for sanity sake – there was no choice. For the god known variously as Amen and Amun and Amana, we only have the hieroglyphs for the “m” and “n” sound – which explains the various guesses. If we were to say, therefore, that saying “Amen” is pagan we would also have to throw out words like manna – however, we don’t even have to go that far because “Amen” in Hebrew is aleph mem nun – not simply mem nun. Three consonants, not two as in the hieroglyphic name of the god.

What does this mean? It means that no one can speak ancient Egyptian! Some scholars can read it, but reading and speaking a language are not even remotely the same thing.

Time and time again we see people making claims about ancient languages and pagan words, and much of the confusion can be eliminated with the realization that ancient languages are pretty much all reconstructions and any archaeological linguist or philologist will tell you that if we went back in a time machine to any ancient culture and tried to speak “their” own language to them they wouldn’t understand what we are saying – nor would we understand them. These languages are educated reconstructions meant not to show us how the languages sounded, but which were instead the tools needed to translate documents. To translate a document, one only needs to know what a series of letters meant in context, not how it sounded. Discoveries of artifacts like the Rosetta stone and the Behistun Inscription have unlocked multiple ancient lost languages, allowing us a window into the Ancient Near East, but no one in the field of study (that I have ever come across) thinks that they can actually speak the true original language. No, my favorite TV show Stargate doesn’t count, it’s fiction and Daniel Jackson wouldn’t really have been able to speak with the people of Abydos.

So, the next time anyone tells you that a Biblical Hebrew word is pagan, know that there is no way on earth to prove it and so there is no reason on earth to worry about it. We don’t even know without a doubt how to pronounce ancient Hebrew, let alone other ancient languages. Let’s worry about what we can, in fact, know – context, character, and spiritual application – chasing pronunciations in dead languages is not something that will yield any fruit in our lives save that of confusion. Barring the digging up of a tape recorder of Pharaoh’s conversations with Moses, there is not much chance that we will ever know for sure how ancient Egyptian sounded – and truly, it isn’t very important. It takes more than putting syllables together to call on the name of any god – it takes faith in that god.

Be sure to check out the related posts about the word Lord, Lord and God, Christ, Yahweh, and IHS

Russell D. Rothe, William K. Miller, George Robert Rapp, Pharaonic Inscriptions from the Southern Eastern Desert of Egypt (consulted for the name of Thutmose in transliterated hieroglyph – available online)

Muriel Mirak Weissbach, Unlocking the Civilization of Ancient Egypt: How Champollion Deciphered the Rosetta Stone, Fidellio, Vol 8, No 3, Fall 1999 (great article for a homeschool resource – linked in body of post)

 




Confronting Pseudo-Archaeological Memes Pt 1 – Does IHS really refer to the Isis-Horus-Set Trinity?

The Egyptian "trinity" of Horus (the hawk-headed god of the sky, personification of the living Pharaoh), Osiris (the dead god of the underworld, personification of the mummified and dead Pharaohs), and Isis (the protector goddess). In order - son, husband, wife.(Pictured: The Egyptian “trinity” of Horus (the hawk-headed god of the sky, the personification of the living Pharaoh), Osiris (the dead god of the underworld, the personification of the mummified and dead Pharaohs), and Isis (the protector goddess). In order – son, husband, wife.)

So, I have been spending a lot of time (and a bit of money) researching ancient Egypt as a part of my Bible context studies. It is incredibly fascinating watching Egyptian mythology pop up throughout not only the first five books of the Bible (the Torah) but also in the Psalms and Prophets – really, throughout the Bible because Egypt was a big player and Israel could not get enough of Egypt! At the end of this blog, I will be sharing some of the books I have been reading.

Now, when I read books on context, I don’t waste my time with most of the stuff out there written about “Babylonian religion” because the overwhelming number of books were not written by archaeologists or scholars but by everyday people who may or may not have done their homework. I stay away from those because I don’t want to “muddy the waters” and I concentrate instead on the enormous amount of primary source material – ancient documents, inscriptions, hieroglyphics, idols, etc.

So what primary source material do we have on Egyptian mythology? Well, more than we have from any other culture – and the material is in better condition because of the climate and burial rites of the ancient Egyptians. This brings me to a claim I have been seeing out there by people who want to promote the idea that the IHS symbol we see in churches stands for the “Trinity” of Isis, Horus, and Set. We are going to look at the evidence, and when the evidence disproves the accusations, the accusations have to be discounted, no matter how interesting they are or how much trust we have invested in them.

Let me teach you about Egyptian trinities – they were Father, Mother, Son trinities. These were family units – husband, wife, and child. No Holy Spirit. Heck, the father can even be dead as a doornail. No virginity required. Virginity wasn’t something highly prized by Egyptians, especially not when people were married, and extra-especially not in their gods and goddesses and anyone who has read the texts knows that the Egyptian pantheon was anything but sexually moral and in fact, they were highly incestuous. The Egyptians not only had trinities, but they also had an Ogdoad (the eight creators of the world, also referred to as the first eight to emerge from the primordial sea) in Upper (Southern) Egypt and the Ennead (a grouping of nine gods – including Isis, Osiris, Horus, and Set).

Now, I am not going to go into great detail here, but the entire idea of a trinity of Isis, Horus, and Set is ludicrous from both the Ancient Near Eastern, Egyptian, and even modern standpoint because of one small problem. Set spent the overwhelming majority of his time being the mortal enemy of both Isis and Horus – his sister and nephew. The stories of the battles between Set and Horus are not for those with weak stomachs – I read them once and that is enough for me. Why were Isis and Horus perpetually warring with Set? Because Set killed his brother Osiris – the husband/brother of Isis and father of Horus. Did Isis and Horus ever hook up with Set and make amends and agree to be worshiped together? Absolutely not, and truth be told, Set was the most hated god in the Egyptian pantheon because Osiris (for the bulk of Ancient Egyptian history) was the most beloved. You see, after Set killed Osiris, Osiris became the dead god of the underworld – caring for those who had gone into the afterlife.

What IHS does stand for is a matter of debate but one thing is certain – no one at any time would have cause to worship Isis, Horus and Set together. Isis was beloved as a protector goddess, Horus was beloved as the sky god and was identified with the living Pharaoh of Egypt, Osiris was beloved as the protector of the dead – but Set was abominated by Egyptians and apart from being worshiped early on, his cult fell into disrepute and he was pretty much universally hated as the enemy of pretty much every decent god out there.

So, why did I write this? Because I see a very damaging tendency out there to attack what we hate at all costs – and even if that cost is the truth itself. Memes lie – all the time and especially about archaeology. And authors don’t always fact check before they write their books, especially if “everyone knows it’s true.” The prophet Jeremiah prophesied we would proclaim that “our father’s have inherited lies” (16:19) and it is true – but we must beware that in combating the lies we don’t fall for other lies. If we cannot verify the information from a scholarly source, from actual archaeology, how can we afford to believe it, put our faith in it, post it on social media, and preach it?

Now, I just gave you the Reader’s Digest version that is fit for children to read but now I will show you my methodology. I saw the accusation on the meme, and knowing very little hard data about Egyptian mythology I went on the internet and found conflicting information depending on agendas with no real source material given. So, that was the last time I was going to try that. I bought some books on Ancient Egyptian and ANE mythology written by people with actual credentials in the field of archaeological study. I ignored the popular and largely sensational books that offered me nothing but conjecture and went to those who were studying the primary source material and who were backed by peers in the field. Anyone can write a book, and say whatever they want! But scholars are subject to peer review, and they are not as quick as most people to destroy the data – because their peers will catch them and expose them.

Be sure to check out the related posts about the word Lord, Lord and God, Christ, Yahweh, and Amen.

So here are some of my books that are readily obtainable and pretty easy reading.

Watterson, Barbara –  The Gods of Ancient Egypt. Watterson is an Egyptologist with a PhD from Liverpool University

Mercatante, Anthony – Who’s Who in Egyptian Mythology. I really liked this one and it included translations of several folktales which were incredibly helpful with my understanding of how ancient Egyptians thought.  His book has the backing of Dr Robert S Bianchi, who holds a PhD in Egyptian Art.

Walton, John – Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament. Not a lot of information as this book was not intended to be specifically Egyptian, but it is just such an important book that I always promote it. He holds a Masters in Biblical Studies and a PhD in Hebrew and Cognate Studies, He is a professor of Old Testament Studies at Wheaton College.

Wilkinson, Richard S – Reading Egyptian Art. This book is very cool on many levels and it is fun now being able to make out a lot of hieroglyphics. Because Isis, Osiris, Horus and Set are so important, you will find them throughout. He is an Egyptologist with 25 years in the field, Regents Professor Emeritus, PhD, Arizona State University.

For more insights on how to study the context of scripture, check out my youtube channel where I just started short weekly teachings on how and why to study Biblical context for yourself.