Las Filacterias Anchas y los Tefilín Largos: El concepto de Honor y Vergüenza en las Redes Sociales

phylacteries espanolGracias a Lisa Velazquez por traducir este articulo. Puede escucharla a traves de Teshuva.tv los Domingos a las 6pm en el programa radial: Caminando en Obediencia.

Ha sucedido muchas veces a lo largo de los años, pero ayer mientras estaba quemando un arbusto en mi propiedad, estuve pensando y orando al respecto. Lo vi ocurrir de nuevo el otro día. Vi a un maestro siendo cuestionado en línea sobre nada – no fue legítimamente interrogado acerca de algo que estaba enseñando, ni impugnado en algún pecado real en su vida, ni siquiera algo en el contexto de la declaración que hizo. No, mi amigo se sometió a tener que responder por algo que no dijo, ni que cree, por alguien que rutinariamente hace acusaciones y pinta la gente como malos frente a otros. Las palabras fueron puestas en la boca de mi amigo por una razón muy específica – incluso si la persona que solicita ni siquiera era consciente del por qué lo estaba haciendo.

Algo que no es fácilmente evidente para los lectores de la Biblia con la mentalidad occidental es la razón de este verso:
Mateo 23:5-7: 5 Todo lo que hacen, lo hacen para ser vistos por otros; pues ellos hacen sus tefilin anchos y sus tzitziyot largos, 6 les fascinan los lugares de honor en los banquetes y los mejores sitios en las sinagogas, 7 y aman ser saludados con deferencia en las plazas de mercado y ser llamados ‘Rabí.’

Se podría decir, “¡Bueno, Tyler, ellos obviamente, estaban tratando de parecerse más justos! ¿Por qué esto tan difícil entender?”

Sí, por supuesto, pero ¿por qué estaban tratando de parecerse más justos? Porque se sentían como si tenían que hacerlo. La respuesta está en la cultura de honor y vergüenza, algo totalmente extraño para el mundo occidental y, sin embargo evidente para las dos terceras partes del mundo de hoy.

Los fariseos, sumos sacerdotes y escribas estaban viviendo en un mundo donde el honor era todo – mucho más importante que el dinero. Honor en esos días es lo que nos referimos como notoriedad o renombre excepto que en esos días uno podía ser una persona desgraciada y horrenda y todavía obtener alto honor. Pensamos del honor como si perteneciera solo a héroes y personas con gran carácter, pero por otra parte legítimamente podía pertenecer a la persona más astuta, calumniosa, y deshonesta en la ciudad, siempre y cuando fuese deshonesta con las personas adecuadas.

En los días del Mesías, así como en los tiempos bíblicos, el honor era una comodidad limitada – se creía que sólo había tanto honor para todos. Cada pueblo, cada clan, cada país, sólo tenían tanto honor disponible y tenía que ser compartido entre los miembros de un grupo paritario. Usted nacía en el honor de su familia – era alto si su padre era un líder de la comunidad y bajo si su padre era el hombre que huía de la batalla o era un mendigo. Obtener más honor consumió la vida pública de los hombres (y fue la verdadera razón por la que las mujeres se quedaban en casa, para que no fueran oprimidas, siendo protegidas de este juego implacable) – y no podía obtenerse simplemente por ser un buen tipo con integridad; esa es nuestra forma de lograr el honor. Elevar el propio nivel de honor a través del esfuerzo personal sólo podía hacerse a expensas de los demás – a través de victorias militares que te elevarían sobre tus compañeros, ganando competiciones atléticas, actuando como un benefactor de la comunidad (usando su dinero para construir edificios o haciendo obras públicas, al igual que el patrocinio de un artesano) o – y esto era la manera más fácil – robarle el honor a los demás a través de retos públicos con la esperanza de elevarse a sí mismo mientras se humillaba al otro individuo y su familia.

Vimos dos tipos de gente haciéndole preguntas a Yeshúa (Jesús) en los evangelios – Los primeros fueron sus discípulos que lo respetaban. Ellos hacían preguntas en privado. El otro grupo de preguntas era en público, y siempre con el propósito de “atraparlo” o “desafiarlo” (incluso algunos “elogios” podían ser desafíos diseñados para avergonzar a la otra persona). ¿Alguna vez ha notado cómo algunos líderes se lamentaban sobre sus grandes obras?

¡Miren, pues, todo el mundo se ha ido tras Él! (Parafraseando Juan 12:19) (el verdadero significado era: “Todo el mundo ha dejado de seguirnos a nosotros”)

A pesar de que Yeshúa no estaba jugando el juego de honor/vergüenza agresiva (no comenzaba a esos desafíos, pero seguro que acababa con ellos), sus enemigos lo eran. Ellos fueron avergonzados en cada ocasión y notemos el lenguaje como, “Y nadie le hacía más preguntas después de eso.” ¿Por qué no? Con cada milagro ejecutado se levantaba el honor de Yeshúa y lo mismo con cada pregunta bien contestada– pero eso es sólo la mitad del caso, cada gran logro estaba tomando el honor lejos de los líderes que lo desafiaban, porque así era la cultura como operaba. Estaban perdiendo su reputación mientras que él la ganaba. Cuando la perdieron a través de un desafío que fue su propia culpa, Yeshúa les advirtió a todos a lo largo de las bienaventuranzas que Él quería revertir el sistema de honor y vergüenza – los avergonzados serían honrados y los honrados serían avergonzados. El explicó en términos generales un sistema en el que los hombres no tenían que tratar de forma agresiva robarle el honor a otros, donde el honor venia de adentro – sin embargo, si iban a desafiarle, perderían porque él conocía sus corazones y Él tenía la sabiduría para vencer sus retos sin recurrir a sus métodos.

Yeshúa vino a destruir el robo de honor y la brutalidad del primer siglo de la cultura grecorromana entre Su pueblo (entre otras razones, por supuesto, vino lograr muchas cosas y sin embargo va a lograr más de las Escrituras cuando regrese). Las personas que están bajo convenio y son leales a Dios tienen honor en el Reino – pero la gente había perdido de vista lo que significaba tener esa clase de honor, debido a la corrupción del sacerdocio ilegítimo de los Saduceos. Yeshúa, en la cruz, restauró el honor de nuestra relación con el Padre, el cual nos da un alto nivel de honor como hijos del Altísimo. El honor que tenemos a través de nuestra relación con el Padre a través de Yeshúa no es poca cosa – es la forma más importante de honor que podemos tener en esta vida. No necesitamos ir en busca de más – sólo tenemos que vivir de acuerdo con lo que se nos ha dado, hacer nuestro trabajo y permitirle al REY quien decida quien reciba cualquier clase de prestigio. Los Fariseos, Escribas y Sacerdotes principales tenían un alto nivel de honor por habérseles sido dado una relación de pacto y los mandamientos en orden para diferenciarse del mundo – que es un gran honor. Pero ¿qué hicieron? ¿Vivieron apreciando ese enorme honor? No, ellos hicieron sus filacterias (tefillim) más anchas y sus borlas (tzitziot) – más largos con el fin lucir más justos de los que les rodeaban. Ellos deseaban más el prestigio del mundo, del tipo que Yeshúa estaba ganando simplemente porque Él halló favor ante los hombres y estaba haciendo cosas que maravillaba al mundo – pero a diferencia de los hombres que conspiraron contra él, Yeshúa nunca utilizó métodos mundanos para ganar prestigio.

Así llegamos a los devoradores de los medios sociales mundiales, y hay gente por ahí que están buscando cualquier cosa insignificante y de menos importancia para subir peldaños no viviendo en honor que se les ha dado, pero a través de socavar los demás y derribarlos con el fin de hacerse más honorables – no más a los ojos de nuestro rey, pero más a los ojos de su pueblo. Es una actividad mundana – una que Yeshúa rechazó cuando se negó a hacer una señal para quienes se lo exigieron a él.

Los hombres de los días de Yeshúa, vivían en una sociedad donde todo el mundo estaba observando las fiestas, los días de reposo, el diezmo a los levitas y comían kosher, sintieron que tenían que hacer algo visible para elevarse por encima de sus paritarios. Estuvieron dispuestos a comportarse de manera abominable hacia su prójimo con el fin de llegarse a ser mayor a los ojos del público. No lo pensaron dos veces, nunca se preguntaron si esto era o no una acción justa – “Si voy a ser más a los ojos de las personas, entonces debo ser menor” Esto está en marcado contraste con la respuesta de Juan del Bautista para el horror de su discípulo que la gente seguía a Yeshúa, en lugar de su maestro: “Él tiene que ser el importante, y yo dejar de serlo.” (Juan 3:30) Juan abrazó el estado honor dado a él por Dios, y no trató de aferrarse a lo que se le estaba dando a Yeshúa.

No podemos amar esa clase de honor, no si se hace a expensas de otra persona. Por desgracia, he encontrado que es difícil navegar las redes sociales y congregaciones incluso locales por el temor de acreditar a otro maestro con algo que se ha aprendido (en lugar de tomar el crédito para uno mismo) sólo para ser sometida a una larga lista de cosas que no se están cumpliendo cabalmente en (y esta lista con frecuencia no presenta pecados actuales, sólo cosas que la persona no le gusta) y tener que escuchar a alguien avergonzar públicamente a otra. Vemos el mismo fenómeno en las redes sociales, donde una persona comienza a golpear tal o cual maestro detrás de su espalda, siempre con el resultado neto de lograr ser más justos para hacer sonar la alarma, o simplemente buscar ser más justos porque obviamente es mejor que este maestro o líder que es menos exigente y más pecaminoso y por lo tanto sospecha ser digno de ser socavado y avergonzado públicamente – pero por lo general el pecado no tiene nada que ver con ello. Los celos son un potente instigador del pecado, una influencia cegadora que a menudo se hace pasar por la justicia. El famoso “celo santo” que muchos suelen defender.
Lo más común que veo, sin embargo, es cuando un maestro trae una enseñanza o postea comentarios en los medios de comunicación sociales y luego se somete a las siguientes técnicas de vergüenza pública por parte de aquellos que tienen celos y quieren que se perciba su mayor nivel de honor que dicen tener.

“Bueno, puedes hacerse la vista gorda al pecado, si está bien con usted, ¡pero me pondré del lado de Yah!”

(Que uno se acostumbra, incluso cuando no hay pecado en el horizonte, pero el atacante quiere elevar algo que odia al nivel de pecado y quiere poner a la otra persona en la defensa – tener que defenderse de algo que no han dicho ni cree. es sólo una forma de alargar sus tzitziyot, sin tener que realizar cualquier otra cosa. Es una forma de auto-exaltación que es fácil y sin sentido, que no requiere la justicia real).

“¿Quieres decir que está bien pecar?”
(Por lo general, la persona está equiparando la merced de ser paciente con los pecados ignorantes a otros con su aprobación al pecado de rebeldía – algo que la Palabra no apoya, a menos que usted suponga que fue escrito en su lenguaje)

“Bueno, puedes seguir escuchando a los hombres… ¡yo voy a escuchar a Dios!”
(Tal vez piensan que suene humilde, pero seguro que no es humilde.)

“¿Estás diciendo que …” o “supongo que acabas de pensar que …”
(Cuando no se puede interceptar una persona que realmente es un hereje, poniendo palabras en su boca (también conocido como mentir a través de acusaciones públicas) es una forma muy efectiva para parecerse al gran salvador de la fe que lucha contra el establecimiento del mal)

“Estás obviamente motivado por…”
(Una vez más, esto es en realidad una forma abierta de mentira)

¿Lo ves? ¿Ves cómo cada frase en realidad implica presunción y muchas veces mentira? ¿Ves cómo se pone a alguien a la defensiva, teniendo que responder a cargos que pueden ser claramente falsos?
¿Qué pasa si una persona no es un pensador rápido, o un buen orador o escritor? ¿Y si su corazón no contiene suficiente sarcasmo o la astucia para defenderse de los cargos suficientes inteligentemente ante la audiencia con la cual el acusador está jugando?

No es algo similar, así, el cargo anónimo que pinta el “atalaya en la pared” como un héroe por señalar lo terrible y peligroso de la gente sin nombre, sin rostro que él o ella está condenando públicamente, con descripciones detalladas de su secreto, motivaciones y supuestos delitos. “Oh, gran héroe de la fe de pie ante tal herejía, ¡bendecido eres!” Por supuesto, porque los cargos están en contra de personas sin nombre, sin rostro, ¿cuál es el punto? El punto es el alargamiento de los tzitziyot y el ensanchamiento de las filacterias. El punto es elevar ese nivel honor a costa de los demás. El punto se ve bien, que siempre ha sido más fácil que ser realmente bueno.

¿Alguna vez se preguntó lo grande del problema sobre el fruto del Espíritu? ¿Por qué fue la promoción del amor, alegría, paz, paciencia, benignidad, bondad, fidelidad, mansedumbre y dominio de sí mismo es un gran problema en parte? En pocas palabras – debido a la madurez espiritual en ese fruto significaba que una persona no podía y no iba a salir a tratar de ganar honor a expensas de los demás. Ellos no serían como las personas que desafiaron, probado y comprobado para atrapar a Yeshúa. No serían como los hombres que mataron a los profetas.

Cuando hacemos cosas a los demás, es como si estuviéramos construyendo las tumbas de los profetas – demostrando que somos los hijos de los que los asesinaron. Sí, veo a gente con filacterias tan amplias en las redes sociales que ya no se pueden ver las caras de las personas a las que están avergonzando, y ciertamente no pueden acceder a la viga en su propio ojo. Sus tzitzit virtuales son tan largos que la gente hasta tropieza con ellos, ya que los arrastran por la tierra – y no sólo son aquellos tzitzit que se arrastran por la tierra, sino también la reputación de nuestro Rey junto con ellos.

Mi amigo me dijo una vez después de uno de estos incidentes sin sentido – que es un excelente líder y maestro en línea – “gente como estos son la razón por la que odio hacer comentarios en Facebook.” ¿Cómo puede el liderazgo liderar y los maestros enseñar o incluso ser personas reales alrededor de otros si los asesinos de honor están esperando en cada esquina – en busca de un acceso directo a la escalera del honor invisible y están dispuestos a subir a través de avergonzar a Dios con el comportamiento que tiene toda ilusión de justicia, pero sin sustancia real y sin amor o madurez real? No me impresiono por los que me dicen que estas personas son “agradable para ellos” o “gente buena si los conoce” – también los publicanos y pecadores eran buenos con sus amigos. Se supone que debemos hacerlo mejor y demos ejemplo.

Así que si alguna vez se pregunta por qué líderes y maestros parecen estar distantes y no interactúan en las redes sociales, es debido a las personas que prefieren robar honor que ganarlo o vivir con honor. Esta clase de gente es agotadora, y por desgracia, están operando con impunidad en lo abierto y, a veces incluso una gran audiencia que los anima a hacer más.




Wide Phylacteries and Long Tefillin: Honor and Shame on Social Media

phylacteriesIt’s happened many times over the years, but yesterday as I was burning brush on my property I was thinking and praying about it. You see, I watched it happen again the other day. I watched a teacher being challenged online over nothing – not legitimately questioned about something he was teaching, not challenged on some actual sin in his life, not even something in context with the statement he made. No, my friend was subjected to having to answer for something he neither said, nor believes by someone who routinely makes accusations and paints people in a bad light. Words were put into my friend’s mouth for a very specific reason – even if the person asking wasn’t even consciously aware if why he was doing it.

Something not readily apparent to western Bible readers is the reason for this verse:

Matthew 23:5-6 “They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, and they love the place of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues.”

You might say, “Well, Tyler, they were obviously trying to appear more righteous! What’s so hard to understand about that?”

Yes indeed, but why were they trying to appear more righteous? Why did they feel as though they needed to do it. The answer lies in honor and shame culture, something utterly foreign in the Western world and yet obvious to two-thirds of the world today.

The Pharisees, Chief Priests and Scribes were living in a world where honor was everything – far more important than money. Honor in those days is what we would refer to as renown or reputation except in those days one could be a horrendous wretch of a person and still have high honor. We think of honor as belonging to heroes, and people with great character, but then it could legitimately belong to the most crafty, slanderous, and dishonest person in town, as long as he was dishonest with the right people.

In Messiah’s day, as well as throughout Bible times, honor was a limited commodity – it was believed that there was only so much honor to go around. Each village, each clan, each country, had only so much honor available and it had to be shared among the members of a peer group. You were born into your family’s honor – which was high if your father was a community leader and low if your father was the man who ran from battle or was a beggar. Gaining more honor consumed the public lives of men (and was the real reason that women stayed home, they weren’t being oppressed but protected from this ruthless game) – and it couldn’t be had simply by being a good guy with integrity; that’s our way of achieving honor. Raising one’s own honor level through personal effort could only be done at the expense of others – through military victories that would elevate you about your peers, winning athletic competitions, acting as a benefactor to the community (using your money to build buildings or do public works, like sponsoring an artisan) or – and this was the easiest way – stealing the honor of others through public challenges and hoping to elevate yourself while humiliating the other guy and his family.

We saw two types of people asking Yeshua (Jesus) questions in the gospels – the first were his disciples and those who respected him. They would ask questions in private. The other group asked questions in public, and always for the purpose of “trapping him” or “challenging him” (even “compliments” could be challenges designed to shame the other person). Have you ever noticed how some leaders lamented over his great works?

“All the world is going after Him!” (paraphrase John 12:19) (real meaning: “All the world has stopped going after us!”)

Although Yeshua wasn’t playing the honor/shame game aggressively (He didn’t start those challenges, but He sure finished them), His enemies were. They were shamed on each occasion and we will see language like, “And no one wanted to ask Him anymore questions after that.” Why not? Every miracle raised up Yeshua’s honor and so did every well-answered question – but that’s only half of it, every great accomplishment was taking the honor away from the leaders who challenged Him because that was how the culture operated. They were losing face as He was gaining it. When they lost it through a challenge it was their own fault, Yeshua warned everyone throughout the beatitudes that He was wanting to turn the honor/shame system upside down – the shamed would be honored and the honored would be shamed. He outlined a system where men were not to aggressively try to steal honor from each other, where honor was to come from within – however, if they were going to challenge Him, they were going to lose because He knew their hearts and He had the wisdom to defeat their challenges without resorting to their methods.

Yeshua came to destroy the honor stealing brutality of the first century Greco-Roman culture among His people (among other reasons, of course, He came accomplish many things and will yet accomplish more of the Scriptures when He returns). People who are in covenant and are loyal to God have honor in the Kingdom – but people had lost sight of what it meant to have that kind of honor, because of the corruption of the illegitimate Sadduceean priesthood. Yeshua, on the cross, restored that honor to our relationship with the Father, giving us a high level of honor as children of the Most High. The honor we have through our relationship with the Father through Yeshua is no small thing – it is the most substantial form of honor that we can have in this lifetime. We don’t need to go seeking for more – we just need to live up to what we have been given by doing our own jobs and allowing the King to decide who also gets worldly types of prestige. The Pharisees, Scribes and Chief Priests had a high level of honor through having been given a Covenant relationship and the commandments in order to set them apart in the world – that is an immense honor. But what did they do? Did they live as though they appreciated that enormous honor? No, they made their phylacteries (tefillim) wider and their tassels (tzitziot) longer – in order to look more righteous than those around them. They desired that worldly prestige, the kind that Yeshua was gaining simply because He had favor with men and was doing things that that makes the world marvel – but unlike the men who conspired against Him, Yeshua never used worldly methods to gain prestige.

So we come to the dog eat dog world social media, and there are people out there who are looking at an unimportant pecking order and trying to climb the rungs of the ladder not through living up to the honor they have already been given, but through undermining others and tearing them down in order to make themselves more – not more in the eyes of our King, but more in the eyes of His people. It is a worldly pursuit – one that Yeshua turned down when He refused to perform a sign for those who demanded it of Him.

The men of Yeshua’s day, because they lived in a society where everyone was observing the Feasts, the Sabbaths, tithing to the Levites and eating kosher, felt they had to do something visible to rise above their peers. They were willing to behave abominably towards their neighbors in order to become greater in the eyes of the public. They didn’t think twice about it, they never questioned whether or not this was a righteous action – “If I am going to be more in the eyes of the people, then he must be less.” This stands in stark contrast to John the Baptist’s response to his disciple’s horror that people were going to Yeshua, instead of their teacher! “He must increase, but I must decrease.” (John 3:30) John embraced the honor status given to him by God, and didn’t seek to hold on to what was being given to Yeshua.

We can’t love that kind of honor, not if it comes at the expense of someone else. Sadly, I have found it hard to navigate social media and even local congregations for fear of crediting another teacher with something I have learned (instead of taking credit for it myself) only to be subjected to a laundry list of things they are falling short in (and this laundry list often has no actual sins on it, just things that the person doesn’t like) and having to listen to someone publicly shaming them. We see the same phenomenon on social media where a person starts bashing this or that teacher behind their back, always with the net result of him or herself looking more righteous for sounding the alarm, or simply looking more righteous because they are obviously better than this teacher or leader who is less discerning and more sinful and therefore suspect and worthy of being undermined and publicly shamed – but generally sin has nothing to do with it. Jealousy is a powerful instigator of sin, a blinding influence that often masquerades as righteousness.

The most common thing I see, however, is when a teacher puts out a teaching or comments on a social media thread and is then subjected to the following public shaming techniques by those who are jealous and want that perceived higher level of honor for themselves.

“Well, maybe turning a blind eye to sin is okay with you, but I will side with Yah!”

(That one gets used even when there is no sin on the horizon, but the attacker wants to elevate something they hate to the level of sin and wants to put the other person on the defense – having to defend against something they have neither said nor believed. It’s just a way to lengthen their tassels without actually having to accomplish anything real. It is a form of self-exaltation that is easy and meaningless, requiring no real righteousness.)

“Are you saying that it’s okay to sin!?”

(Usually the person is equating the mercy of being patient with the ignorant sins of others with approving of full-blown rebellious sin – something the Word doesn’t support, unless you presume it was written in English)

“Well, you can keep listening to men and I will listen to God!”

(Maybe they think that sounds humble, but it sure isn’t humble.)

“So you’re saying that…” or “I guess you just think that..”

(When you can’t trap a person actually being a heretic, putting words in their mouth (aka lying about them through public accusations) is a very effective way to look like the great savior of the faith battling against the evil establishment)

“You are obviously motivated by…”

(Again, this is actually an overt form of lying)

Do you see it? Do you see how each phrase actually involves presumption and oftentimes lying? Do you see how it puts someone on the defensive, having to respond to charges that may be patently false?

What if a person isn’t a quick thinker, or a good speaker or writer? What if their heart doesn’t contain enough sarcasm or guile to fend off the charges cleverly enough for the audience that the accuser is playing for?

There is something similar as well, the anonymous charge that paints the “watchman on the wall” as a hero for pointing out how terrible and dangerous the nameless, faceless people he or she is condemning publicly really are, complete with detailed accounts of their secret motivations and supposed crimes. “Oh, you great hero of the faith standing up to such heresy, bless you!” Of course, because the charges are against nameless, faceless people, what’s the point? The point is the lengthening of tassels and the widening of phylacteries. The point is raising that honor level at the expense of others. The point is looking good, which has always been easier than actually being good.

Ever wonder what the big deal is about the fruit of the Spirit? Why was the promotion of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control such a huge deal? Very simply put – because spiritual maturity in that fruit meant that a person could not and would not go out trying to gain honor at the expense of others. They wouldn’t be like the people who challenged, tested and tried to trap Yeshua. They wouldn’t be like the men who murdered the prophets.

When we do those things to others, it’s like we are building the tombs of the prophets – proving that we are the children of those who murdered them. Yeah, I see people with phylacteries so wide on social media that they can no longer see the faces of the people whom they are shaming, and they certainly can’t access the log in their own eye. Their virtual tassels are so long that people are tripping over them as they drag through the dirt – and not only are those tassels being dragged through the dirt but also our King’s reputation along with it.

My friend told me once after one of these pointless incidents – he is an excellent leader and teacher online – “people like these are the reason I hate making comments on facebook.” How can leadership lead and teachers teach or even be real people around other people if honor assassins are waiting around every corner – looking for a shortcut up that invisible honor ladder and willing to climb it through shaming God with behavior that has all the illusion of righteousness but no real substance and no actual love or maturity? I’m not impressed by those who tell me that such people are “nice to them” or “great guys if you know them” – even the tax collectors and sinners are good to their friends. We are supposed to do better.

So if you are ever wondering why leaders and teachers seem aloof and don’t interact on social media, it’s because of the people who would rather steal honor than earn it or live honorably. They are exhausting, and sadly, they are operating with impunity in plain site and sometimes even to a large cheering audience encouraging them to do more.

 

 

 

 




For Such a Time as This? Purim in the Context of Now.

A good friend called today. We were talking about his Skid Row ministry and how it is thriving. I laughed and reminded him that just about nine months ago he called me because some internet preacher had encouraged him to buy some property and head for the hills because it was time to leave the cities.

I am so relieved that he didn’t go but instead chose to remain with those to whom he has been called to minister.  Besides–no way is he cut out for farm life and the staying put that the caring for livestock naturally demands. He isn’t cut from that cloth. My friend is a natural evangelist and a city boy whose ministry requires that he be a city boy. Can you imagine a city evangelist taking care of cows out in the middle of Texas?

What does it mean to be called “for such a time as this”? As we see in the Book of Esther, God doesn’t always place us in cozy situations where it is easy to keep His laws–sometimes (usually), we are born in exile into a Torah-unfriendly world where we must live and be a light. Sometimes living in exile even means that we are not always able to live as we desire. Ask Nehemiah, the King’s cupbearer–daily standing in the court of a ruthless pagan king and entrusted with his cup day and night 24/7/365. How about Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego–forced to go to Babylonian schools and learning the ways of Babylon yet coming out wise, learned and faithful even to the point of facing a death sentence. I lament at how difficult it can be at times and do understand why so many observant Jews gather together into communities where it is possible to run their own lives as closely to God’s laws and timetables as humanly possible whilst in exile. But are they reaching the world?

What of the rest of us who are called to be salt and light in the world? We, like Esther, were also born for such a time as this and it is error to have our eyes more on survival than on whatever Kingdom jobs have been given to us. My friend started in Hollywood and ended up homeless on Skid row and now that is where he is called to serve–ministering in both worlds as only he is equipped to do. What if he buys a plot of land, as some encourage him to do, and goes out to live in the wilderness? Who then ministers to the poor, needy, widowed, orphaned and oppressed on Skid Row? Is one man’s survival worth all the souls he could impact in the days, months, years or decades left before he might meet his end in the city? What exactly is our calling, to ourselves or to the lost?

Esther said, “If I perish, then I perish.” Esther needed to get out of the fear-based survival mindset and had to become community-minded. We all need to be community-minded. Community can’t be had with cows, sheep, goats, and chickens out on the back forty unless that is where we are specifically called to be–and some people are. We each need to be doing our jobs when the Master returns, or what excuse will we have when all we can return to Him is the talent we buried?

Dying is not dreadful. Dying where we aren’t supposed to be, and while we are not doing what we are called to do is dreadful. Find that thing and do it–whether you are the enduring mom and dad just trying to get your own kids raised right, or, like my friend, ministering on Skid Row or just whatever it is that needs doing. Our sphere of influence isn’t important. The number of people hanging on our every word is almost irrelevant. Our safety is also unimportant if that safety comes at the cost of the people we were supposed to be there for–but abandoned for the sake of our own skin and out of service to our own morbid and faithless fears.

I once heard a YouTube personality state that we have only two choices—run to the country or compromise. But he was wrong. There is also the third choice of standing firm. Maybe we die, and maybe we don’t, but the true church thrives on persecution.

God isn’t done reaching out to the people in the cities. When we moved from rural Missouri to Idaho Falls, people told me that I would die when the Yellowstone Caldera erupts. Oh well, big deal. Survival isn’t the point of our lives in Messiah’s service. Better to die doing what I was called to do than to live where I have become useless and unprofitable.

I was proud of my friend for not giving in to those who would have him be “just like them.” There will always be people who have made certain decisions who, in order to justify their own choice, will try to recruit and scare everyone else into making that same choice (ever have a friend deny Yeshua (Jesus) as Messiah? That’s your prime example right there). But if we are truly called, and doing what we are called to do, then we don’t need to recruit anyone to be exactly like we are. We can do our job and equip and encourage others to do theirs. There will never be another me and there will never be another you. You can’t do my job and I can’t do yours, and neither of us can do our jobs if we are not where we are supposed to be.

So, take it easy. Do what you are being called to do and go where you are being called to go. There are a bunch of wannabe prophets and teachers and personalities out there playing a fiddle that you don’t need to dance to.

Don’t be so afraid to die that you miss your calling. You were born for such a time as this.

Happy Purim.

 




Hijacked Devotion: The Tyranny of Name it/Claim it Theology

faithYou don’t have to be a special needs parent to understand this, but it sure helps.

A compelling doctrine cruelly hijacked my life, taking advantage of the desperation known by all too many parents. It was reiterated over and over again that God was going to completely heal my son Andrew, that all I had to do was walk in the authority given to me – the “favor” of God, and that my son Andrew would be healed.

Don’t get me wrong, when God has specifically told me to pray, I have seen miracles. It hasn’t been a lack of faith or a lack of prayer or a lack of obedience holding back the miracles. That’s the easy answer you hear from people who don’t have challenges to walk through, people who are not being given lives that teach them how to endure hardship. Really, I am not interested in the opinions of people with easy lives – they all too often presume that their “blessed” status is some sign of favor even in light of the fact that every great servant of God has endured terrible ordeals as they are prepared for service.

We learn nothing from an easy life, and we certainly have no proof that we are loving, joyful, peaceful, patient, kind, good faithful, gentle and self-controlled if no great crisis ever puts those attributes to the test. As Messiah said, even tax collectors and sinners are good to those who are good to them.

The idea that God was waiting in the wings to heal my son if I would just “walk in my authority” was a crippling one – it absolutely put my life on hold. You see, we can live our lives in one of two ways – we can live in the future where everything is fixed, or we can learn to have good fruit by enduring in the now. The presumption that God has an obligation to heal my son, and the faith that He will do it because He somehow owes it to me if I meet this sort of magical combination of requirements isn’t faith at all – it’s committing Him to fulfilling my will. I have lived not with an awareness of His mercy, but with an expectation that He is going to fix problems that I am tired of coping with.

That’s a problem, and its conveniently arrogant. Not only that, but it completely disregards the Scriptural fact that God’s servants often live with terrible trials that don’t just go away quickly and sometimes they are, in fact, fatal. Name it and claim it is not a way to live – looking at our challenges square in the eye and embracing those challenges as a way to refine us – that is where the true blessing lies. Everything in our life has the capacity to change us, but we want it all to be swept away – we want our circumstances to change while we stay as we are. God loves us too much to do that to us.

Being Andrew’s mom has taught me about love, mercy and compassion. I am learning endurance, and about how to live in a real world where sometimes the frustration and shame hit me so hard that I feel like I am drowning. I have  learned that a person’s outside circumstances don’t define who they are in God’s eyes or God’s plans. I know that the difference between financial wealth and poverty are often related to nothing more than the health of a family member.

Name it and claim it theology taught me to be unsatisfied and ungrateful for what I have right now, to be hungry for more and more. It taught me that my life isn’t good enough yet. It taught me to just bide my time in the present while living for future perfect days when the difficult aspects of my life have been swept away. Name it and claim it made me tired, and hope deferred made my heart sick.

It wasn’t that my faith was wanting, or that there was some great failing in me that others lack – this is simply the reality of the life chosen for me when God told us to adopt the boys. This is my chosen path, this is the road I need to walk out – not some fantasy life where everything is perfect and everything is okay. A life that appears perfect not because I actually am perfect but which only appears perfect because every problem that would force me to grow has been eliminated. That isn’t a perfect life. A perfect life is about me becoming perfect, something that cannot happen without hardship and opposition.

I am in the crucible being burned and boiled – it’s been this way for many years now. I have spent too many years praying that the crucible will disappear and not enough time embracing the refining that the crucible brings. Name it and claim it thinking, so many years ago now, robbed me of the reality of a life that must be dealt with today, as it is and not how I hope it will someday change. I have to be willing to live this life that was chosen for me, as it is.

The worst thing about “Name it and claim it” is the mask that its adherents have to wear because they have to look blessed in order to look like legitimate believers. Hogwash!

There will be no “rapture” of all of my problems. They are here for a reason, they prepare me, they refine me – but more than that, they remind me that I am just like everyone else who has ever served God, and certainly not entitled to special treatment. Name it and claim it tells me that I am entitled, that I am special, and that if I do everything right then God will have to respond as though I have gotten all of the components right in some magical spell or potion.

What if God’s plan for my son doesn’t involve a full, miraculous healing? I mean, this isn’t just about my life but about his. Andrew is his own unique person, and he has trials to go through as well – being disabled teaches and refines him into a unique kind of person that someone born without disability could never hope to be. Andrew has his own calling, and maybe – just maybe, I am nothing more than the person chosen to care for him while he goes through all this. Name it and claim it made it all about me and my desires and whims as though they were more important than the larger plan. But it’s never been about me, or about Andrew – it’s about God’s big puzzle and how everything works together for a good.

I’m no longer interested in a theology that just removes my problems as though challenges are inherently negative. I don’t want the kind of parent who enables their children by making everything easy. And it’s funny – I haven’t subscribed to that sort of nonsense for years, but the poison was still there and making everything about me.

There’s a reason that people listen to this sort of doctrine – it really does promote the concept of self-centeredness under the guise of making God mighty. In actuality, however, it just makes Him into a sugar daddy and a servant to our covetous desires for a life filled with wealth, health, and perfect contentedness. Preaching it is a great way to make money and draw a crowd, but living that way is sheer, presumptuous denial. We don’t see people living these kinds of lives in the Bible – it’s pure western individualistic narcissism.

(Edit: as my friend Victor pointed out in the comments, and I neglected to mention – the men and women who preach this lack a basic understanding of the fact that we are living in Exile as a result of rebellion, we are not living in the Land with God as our King, and living under His laws – obedience to which brought the blessings and disobedience to which brought expulsion from the Land and made us subject to the consequences, aka curses. We can try, out here in exile, but until the Kingdom is restored under Yeshua, we can’t “walk in the blessings.” If we are going to own the blessings of Leviticus 26, we have to own the curses as well)

I repent.




The Great Misconceptions of Vayikra: The Jews, the Temple, and the Sacrificial System

vayikraI am not proud of this, but I am going to be 100% honest. I have been known, in the past, to say – “Of course the Jews want the Temple back – it must be incredibly stressful to them to know that they aren’t being forgiven for their sins.”

I would say that this is the misconception of almost everyone in the Christian world. It’s taught from the pulpits – but it isn’t supported by either Jewish thought or by the Scriptures. Remember that we are reading a translated document – a document translated by men who had that belief that without the blood of bulls and calves that there is no personal forgiveness for sins, but that is a loaded statement – what forgiveness of sins is being referred to in that statement and what was the function of blood in the Temple? This isn’t going to be an in depth teaching – this is going to be a skim. If you are going to read this and go no further then it is going to be a “taking my word for it” sort of situation but let’s be honest – all anyone can do in a short teaching is give you something to or not to believe in. What I will do is provide you with part of my study and reading list, as I always do. I am hoping that you won’t dismiss what I am saying out of hand, I want you to study it out. I understand that there are short and long teachings all over the internet, especially those little social media memes (posters) that tell you that something is true and they give you no (or questionably sourced) evidence – they are simply asking you to believe that they know what they are talking about. I am not going to do that – my goal is to give you something to consider and then the opportunity to replicate my studies in your own home.

This is a very simple teaching, a gloss and a gloss means – to deal with a subject too lightly

(Here is the teaching at kid level in video form)

First of all, credit where credit is due – Ryan White has an excellent course on his website called Temple Service According to Honor and Shame. It’s part of his Yeshiva and should be a required study for anyone wanting to discuss the sacrificial system. Some of the other books I have recently studied are in my Bibliography below. I am not going repeat his teaching, as I said, this is a skim presented more in parable form designed to help parents to teach their children about this week’s Torah portion. Not everyone wants to be or needs to be a scholar. There is a belief out there that the Jews are languishing in stress because they can’t bring animal sacrifices to atone for their sins, but there is a problem with this concept – namely because without a Temple in place, there is absolutely no reason to bring those types of sacrifices. There are a number of different kinds of sacrifices, and only some involve the ritual atonement of smearing blood upon either the outer bronze altar, the inner incense altar, or the sprinkling of blood on the Ark of the Covenant. Although all offerings (blood offerings, anyway) require the gifting of all the blood to the Lord (for the life is in the blood Lev 17:11), not all require the sprinkling or smearing of the blood on the horns or in the actual Holy of Holies. Why is that?

Well, some offerings are simply gifts of thanksgiving, a way to draw near to God within the framework of the Covenant relationship. Even the very word, sacrifice, korban – well, it means to “draw near.”  It is the symbolic offering of a Covenant meal with the Lord in order to honor Him in the sight of the nations. Is it any different than honoring a guest by preparing a fine meal in their honor? In all cultures, “killing the fatted calf” is how one honors and draws near to someone else – whether relations are already good, or if they have been strained through sin or treachery.

So we aren’t going to discuss the “good relations” sacrifices, because in that case the blood is simply sprinkled around the base of the altar (maybe someday I will explain why they made sure to do that, but not today). We are going to discuss the intentional or unintentional sin sacrifices and why they had to be dealt with through the smearing, splashing, or sprinkling of blood on various Temple furniture and why we don’t see that practiced in the sacrifices before the tabernacle and why they are not needed in the absence of a Tabernacle or Temple and why they will resume, and should resume, when a new one is built. You will see why the Jews are not really stressing out about not being able to do this right now – it just isn’t the point of wanting to have a standing Temple. This has been a grave misunderstanding that has done a great injustice to people’s feelings about the Temple.

A standing Temple is about honoring God with an earthly sanctuary for His esteem and glory where He can dwell in the midst of His people, having a holy sanctuary, a sort of transitory place between Heaven and Earth. Period. It’s about having a central place of His choosing where He can be offered tribute as the King of kings and the Lord of lords, the Creator of Heaven and Earth. It’s about rendering honor in the way He has commanded and chosen. It’s about all of God’s people being able to gather during the three festivals to serve God with one shoulder and worship Him as one people.

When there is a Tabernacle or Temple, and the people who live in the vicinity of that structure sin – well, to oversimplify it, it brings grave dishonor onto that Tabernacle or Temple (I will refer to both Biblically as the “Dwelling Place” of God). If a normal worshiper sins, the amount of dishonor is far less than say, when a leader sins – especially the High Priest. This just makes sense. If an American goes abroad and behaves badly, it creates a small stain on the American reputation. If a senator behaves badly, the stain is much bigger, and the apology issued has to be greater. If the President behaves badly, we have a full blown international incident that brings great shame on our country. It isn’t anything you can see with your eyes (well, not in the days before the media, anyway), but the stain is there, dishonoring America. In the same way, we had the sins of the nation of Israel bringing shame on the Dwelling place of God.

For personal forgiveness, as in the case of David with Bathsheba and Uriah, repentance is all that has ever been required, but for the atonement and forgiveness of the shame and stain of our sins upon God’s holy Dwelling Place – the removal of that required blood. The life is in the blood – blood brings a purification; blood cleans away shame.

Think about sin as a form of invisible graffiti on your neighbors house, invisible, but your neighbor can see it and so can you even if other people can’t see where your tagging is. He has a beautiful house, but day by day the other neighbors tag it with their invisible spray paint – the layers of it are building up as he is disrespected. He knows it is there, and the disrespect and shaming become an unbearable stench in his nostrils until he can’t stand to live there anymore and he moves away – knocking the dust off his shoes as he leaves the neighborhood.

We see in the Scriptures similar concepts – if the Israelites became too wicked, God promised that the Land would “vomit them out.” During the exodus, after the incident with the golden calf, God didn’t want to be “in their midst” anymore – the idea was that if a place became too polluted with shame, God would not consent to dwell there anymore, because His holiness demanded better, and we see this throughout the ancient world. So what would happen in response to sin?

The person who sinned would bring the prescribed offering, lay his hand on it (lean on it) before the Lord and then sacrifice it. The blood from that offering would then remove the shame of his (and only his, and consequently his household’s) sins from the altar, it would remove that pollution from the specific altar he had shamed – be it intentional or unintentional and I am not going to elaborate on the differences here. The higher the rank, and the more rebellious the sin, the deeper the pollution went towards (and even into) the Holy of Holies). We see this very clearly in the application of Yeshua’s blood in the Heavenly Temple, once and for all cleansing that Temple in a way that the blood of bulls and goats could not. You will notice that in the Talmud it clearly states that for the forty years after Yeshua was killed, the Yom Kippur sacrifice was never accepted again (Yoma 39) – why? Because the unrepentant sin through the wickedness of the High Priest Caiaphus (under the authority of his father in law Annas and the Roman authorities who sold his family the priesthood when they weren’t even eligible Biblically) had so polluted the Temple that it could never be cleansed again – hence it’s destruction forty years later.

This is why such sacrifices not only do not, but cannot exist when there is no Temple – there is no sanctuary to pollute! It is also why, when there is no Temple, that no sacrifices at all can be offered because the blood belongs to God and it has to be presented to Him at a consecrated altar in the place where He has chosen and in the way He has chosen. To construct an altar in the backyard and call it holy ground is a severe encroachment upon God’s rights. Something isn’t holy just because we decide it is – we don’t have that authority. Something is only holy because God has set it apart.

I want to go back to the spray painted house. What if, before it got bad enough to drive the man out, the neighbors brought a bucket and sponges? What if they came by with a side of beef and said, “I am really sorry that I did this, I want you to accept this from me – I want to honor you because I have dishonored you. I want to make amends personally but not only that, I am here with a bucket and sponge to clean the graffiti off of your house that I put there. I want your home to be a place of honor again.” That is the atonement – when we undo the shame we have brought onto something or someone.

A new temple would constitute a fresh start, and would in no way be a repudiation of Yeshua because a Temple would in no way nullify what He came to do. He did not come so as to replace the Temple – after all, the Temple existed to honor God. Yeshua was livid, absolutely livid, when “His Father’s House” was being polluted by graft and other criminal activities. He taught in the Temple daily, when He was “lost” after the Passover at the age of twelve, He was doing “His Father’s business” in the Temple courts. Yeshua never spoke a word against the Temple and indeed, His disciples kept meeting there and Paul and some other young men took and completed vows there in the book of Acts, vows that required offerings (Acts 21). When Paul said that he “by all means must keep this feast” in Acts 18:21, he meant that he was returning to Jerusalem for the Passover – which meant the sacrifice of a lamb at the Temple for the yearly memorial/celebration dinner that exalted God for their deliverance from Egypt.

Everything done at the Temple was performed for the purpose of honoring God in one way or another – either through worship, through sharing Covenant meals, the giving of gifts, the making of restitution, etc. – it was (and will be) all about treating God like God and giving Him His due in sight of the world.

Daniel 9:27 contains a statement that should make sense now – that in the middle of the “seven” he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. Putting an end to sacrifice and offering serves one purpose and one purpose only – to allow the Temple to become more and more polluted, thus dishonoring God and creating an offense against Him. The Temple is about honoring God, but a Temple that exists without the cleansing of blood in the midst of a sinful world cannot honor God.

This is what the Jews want, not forgiveness – they understand that forgiveness has always been about repentance. Their daily prayers show this clearly. What they desire, is to add to their prayers the public honor that God deserves. That is my desire as well – I want that monstrosity gone and a Temple to the only one true God on top of the most coveted piece of real estate on earth. I want 24/7 webcams displaying the gleaming, gorgeous, pristine glory of a Temple built for the King of kings. I want what my Messiah wants – glory for His Father.

Let’s face it, we all want the Dome of the Rock to be trampled by pigs and get divinely catapulted into the sea. The Muslims did what Muslims do, they cleared the Temple Mount, looked at the outcropping of rock that protrudes from the pavement (the top of Mt Moriah) and built their own shrine over it – the very place where the Holy of Holies sat. To build over the holy sites of their conquered foe is nothing new. I want it razed, gone, replaced and forgotten.

That may seem like a lot but really, I just taught you almost nothing. This is an incredibly deep subject, far more concrete than we have given it credit for in how we were taught to spiritualize the entire sacrificial transaction.

Bibliography/Recommended Reading

White, Ryan Temple Service According to Honor and Shame, www.rootedintorah.com in the yeshiva section

Sklar, Jay Leviticus

Milgrom, Jacob Leviticus (Continental Commentary)

Gilders, William Blood Ritual in the Hebrew Bible